U.S. Supreme Court Rejects BP, Anadarko Bids To Keep away from Gulf Oil Spill Penalties
WASHINGTON, June 29 (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Courtroom on Monday rejected bids by BP Plc and Anadarko Petroleum Corp to keep away from penalties beneath federal pollution regulation in reference to the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill.
The excessive court docket left in place a June 2014 ruling by crude oil separation process the new Orleans-based mostly fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which stated the businesses had been liable for civil penalties beneath the federal Clean Water Act.
The April 20, 2010, Deepwater Horizon drilling rig explosion and Macondo oil nicely rupture killed 11 workers and brought about the largest offshore environmental disaster in U.S. historical past, polluting giant elements of the Gulf, killing marine wildlife and crude oil separation process harming businesses.
BP could face a maximum penalty of $13.7 billion underneath the Clear Water Act. Anadarko says it could possibly be required to pay greater than $1 billion.
U.S. District Decide Carl Barbier in New Orleans has not but imposed penalties, however has dominated that BP was grossly negligent and that 3.19 million barrels of oil have been spilled.
General, BP has incurred more than $42 billion in costs for the spill, together with cleanup, fines and victim compensation.
BP and Anadarko owned a respective 65 p.c and 25 p.c of the Macondo effectively.
The companies had argued in part that they shouldn’t be accountable for oil spilled because of failed tools on the drilling rig, which was owned by Transocean Ltd.
As co-owners of the well, BP and Anadarko would be on the hook for ensuing fines, the appeals court docket dominated.
Transocean agreed last 12 months to pay the U.S. authorities $1 billion in civil penalties over the spill.
The cases are BP Exploration and Production Inc. v. U.S. and crude oil separation process Anadarko Petroleum Corp v. U.S. U.S. Supreme Court docket, Nos 14-1217 and 14-1167.