The Platts High 250 acknowledges outstanding financial efficiency for the earlier fiscal year. Every firm listed within the Platts Top 250 has distinguished itself via its exceptional efficiency and the outstanding efforts and dedication of its workforce. […]
The entry of German multi-utility E.ON AG to the highest ten in 2009the one non-Built-in Oil and Gasoline (IOG) company to do so in the final 5 years—proved fleeting [please see remarks below — D.R.]. The oil and gas giants reasserted their dominance of the top ten rankings, taking all ten spots despite a stricken BP dropping far from sight. On the back of higher oil prices, the highest ten firms introduced in a combined $178.874 billion in earnings, a 20.Four% enhance from 2009, however nonetheless down from the bumper 12 months of 2008, when income hit an all-time high of $214.042 billion.
US large Exxon Mobil Corp retained the highest spot in 2010, whereas Chevron Corp moved up from ninth in 2009 to second place because it boosted its return on invested capital (ROIC) to 16% from 10.2% within the earlier year. Gazprom OAO, PetroChina Co Ltd, Total SA and the China Petroleum & Chemical Corp took third, fourth, fifth and eighth places, respectively, while Royal Dutch Shell climbed from tenth to sixth.
Three re-entrants to the highest ten in 2010 included ConocoPhillips—now the topic of an revolutionary demerger into upstream and downstream businesseswhich moved up from twenty fourth place to seventh. In the meantime Russia’s OJSC Rosneft Oil Company and Lukoil Oil Company rose from 14th and 11th locations, respectively to take the ninth and tenth spots.
E.ON dropped again to thirteenth from sixth, and Brazil’s Petrobras-Petroleo Brasilier fell from fourth in 2009 to 12th in 2010. However the biggest omission from the highest ten was UK main BP. Ranked second in 2009, BP dropped to 118th on account of the price of the Macondo oil spill within the US Gulf of Mexico. Although in dollar terms its asset base expanded, as did its revenues, BP’s earnings have been wiped out. The corporate posted a loss for 2010 of $three.719 billion.
Here Come the Russians
Though the 12 months-to-yr changes in the highest ten companies can be small, the big traits might be seen from longerterm comparisons. In 2006, the highest ten consisted of five west European built-in oil and gasoline corporations, three US majors, PetroChina and Petrobras. In 2010, there were still three US majors but now two Chinese language and three Russian firms, with only two European firms remaining. […]
The entry of Russian corporations into the ranks of the world’s top power enterprises is a putting feature of the 2010 checklist, and options not only oil and gas, but in addition electricity industry corporations as a result of privatization within the sector. Of the highest ten fastest-growing corporations, three are Russian: RusHydro JSC, Bashneft OJSC and Moscow United Electric Grid OJSC, with RusHydro recording an enormous three-12 months CGR of 106.1%. There are now 15 Russian corporations in the highest 250, in contrast with 11 in 2009 and nine in 2006.
Mighty Gazprom’s position stays pre-eminent in natural gasoline, based mostly on its big production volumes and monopoly grip on Russia’s fuel pipelines and exports. However, it may someday have a challenger within the type of non-public gasoline company Novatek OAO, which is operator of the deliberate Yamal LNG mission. Novatek has moved up from 126th place in 2009 to 104th in 2010. Income rose from $854 million to $1,358 million with a formidable ROIC of 19% in 2010—the twelfth-highest ROIC out of the entire high 250. It is usually the 34th fastest-growing company based on its three-yr CGR. Including AK Transneft OAO, the country’s oil pipeline monopoly, Russia now has eight firms primarily targeted on oil in the top 250 in addition to two fuel and 5 energy sector firms. […]
The variety of Asian corporations in the highest 250 continues to rise, reaching 70 in 2010, up from 67 in 2009 and 56 in 2006. In addition, regardless of having more corporations represented, the average ranking of Asian companies has additionally improved from 135.2 in 2006 to 134.9 in 2009 and 131.3 in 2010 (a lower number denotes a better ranking). Asian corporations will not be just growing in number, but are growing their rankings relative to their international peers.
Within Asia, the average rating of Japanese corporations general has improved from 145.9 to 132.1. This partly reflects the Japan Petroleum Exploration company dropping out of the highest 250, but the improvement is notable given the sharp fall within the ranking of the Tokyo Electric Power Co (Tepco) which was ranked 54th in 2009, however 131st in 2010.
That is the results of the monetary influence of the Fukushima nuclear disaster in March 2011 and Japanese reporting of monetary data based mostly on fiscal years working from April-March. Tepco recorded a loss of $14,881 billion in fiscal 2010. Different Japanese companies dropping down the rankings include Tohoku Electric Power Co, which fell from 119th to 156th and Chugoku Electric Power Co, which dropped from 134th to 178th.
By distinction, Japan’s oil and fuel firms carried out nicely. JX Holdings was the shining star, rising from 129th in 2009 to 18th in 2010. Idemitsu Kosan Co Ltd increased its ranking from 144th to 70th. Tokyo Gasoline Company Ltd upped its place in the checklist from 108th to 74th. For China, most change was seen inside the power sector. The number of Chinese companies in the highest 250 was the same in 2010 as in 2009, however the Shenzhen Power Group, Huadian Energy Intl Corp and Shenergy Co. Ltd had been displaced by Shanxi Lu’an Environmental Energy Development Co., Shanxi Xishan Coal and Electricity Power Co. and China Longyuan Power Group. Within the oil sector, PetroChina moved up from seventh in the rankings to fourth, and CNOOC from twenty ninth to fifteenth. The biggest mover, however, was China Yangtze Power Co., which jumped from 163rd in 2009 to 112th in 2010.
By contrast, India saw three new corporations join the top 250 list—the newlylisted Coal India, oil and fuel producer Cairn India Ltd and the IPP company NHPC Ltd. As in Japan, the oil sector also gave India its strongest movers. The Indian Oil Corp Ltd jumped from 78th in 2009 to 42nd in 2010, whereas the Hindustan Petroleum Corp Ltd rose from 174th to 142nd. […]
(Please see my post “Platts Prime 250 Global Energy Company Rankings 2010.” Individually, please watch “High 250 Power Firm Rankings  evaluation: ‘Big Oil’ dominates, but Asia steals the show,” Platts, Nov 2, 2011 and see Platts 2011 rankings for 2010, pdf file. Update: It’s all eyes on China, India and the wider Asia-Pacific area in terms of rapid financial progress and quick-rising power companies. Seventy corporations from the region had been within the highlight tonight when the 2012 Platts Top 250 International Power Firm Rankings were unveiled at an awards dinner in Singapore. The 2012 rankings mirror fiscal 2011 financial efficiency in 4 key areas: asset value, revenues, earnings and return on invested capital/ROIC. … In an East-West power showdown, Western majors nonetheless dominated. Western built-in oil and gasoline/IOG and exploration and manufacturing/E&P corporations took all of the highest 10 spots on the 2012 record, apart from one – ninth place – which went to PetroChina Co. Ltd. ExxonMobil reigned supreme in the primary spot of the top 250 roster for the eighth consecutive 12 months. Anglo-Dutch main Royal Dutch Shell plc moved up from sixth position to second, displacing U.S. major Chevron to third. ConocoPhillips dropped one place from seventh to eighth. Though French major Whole slipped from fifth position to seventh, different European majors noticed enhancements. Like Shell, Norway’s Statoil also ascended, climbing from 11th place to sixth between the 2011 and 2012 rosters. One of many standout movers among the highest 10 and the overall rankings was BP. The U.Okay. oil major took fourth place on this year’s checklist, after having plummeted from second place in 2010 to 118th place last year after greater than $38 billion in losses from the Macondo oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Different majors, together with Russian oil and fuel giants, held on to their comparatively excessive global rankings, regardless of slipping within the standings. Gazprom/Open Joint Inventory Firm – OJSC Gazprom dropped to fifth place this 12 months from third place, whereas Rosneft dipped from ninth to 10th. OJSC LUKOIL slipped out of the top 10 this yr to eleventh place—please see Platts, press release, Oct 23, 2012.